Theory of Knowledge

Is astrology a pseudoscience? Astrology is a pseudoscience because it claims to be using facts, such as the movement of the planets, to predict human behavior, but in reality there is no factual evidence that supports the idea that the position of the stars and planets affects or predicts how humans behave or their personality traits. If you have ever read your horoscope you can see that this is the case. If astrology were a true science then your horoscope would be fairly accurate all the time, and it would likely be more specific, as well as being the same across all horoscope sites. Instead, your horoscope is different depending on where you look, and it is vague and only somewhat accurate. Astrology is a belief system that looks at planets and stars and their movements and claims to see patterns in human behavior based on these, but there is not enough hard fact or observational work behind it for it to be a true science.

https://theconversation.com/real-bodies-controversy-how-australian-museums-regulate-the-display-of-human-remains-95644 Knowledge question: to what extent does the history of the people in the museum influence ethics. Knowledge claim: ethical concerns were raised about the bodies in the museum. knowledge questions: what kind of truths are the arts capable of expressing? To what extent are the insights available from the appreciation of a work of art dependent upon the intentions of an artist? What could be meant by artistic truth? what might be meant by a lie in the context of an artwork to what extend are the limits of art defined by morality?